That political animal known as man…
Posted on Nov 4th, 2009 by E P Wohlfart |Man is by nature a political animal.

Aristotle was commenting on man's social nature
Of course, that is not at all what Aristotle intended.
In fact politics – the art and science of influencing governmental policy and action – was not on Aristotle’s mind at all. What Aristotle actually wrote, which has been translated into political animal was “πολιτικον ζωον” (politikon zoon) which quite simply means “an animal of the polis”. A polis is the grouping of citizens into an autonomous city-state, for example ancient Athens.
What Aristotle is saying, in other words is that while some animals live alone, and some form packs, man is the kind of animal that by nature forms city-states. In other words, “man is my nature a pretty advanced herd animal”.
It’s not just the translation that gives us this peculiar and a little misanthropic interpretation of Aristotle’s intent. It is also that we simply take him very much out of context. As you will see, it is the man who is not “political” (of the polis) who is the dangerous one:
Hence it is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that
man is by nature a political animal. And he who by nature and not
by mere accident is without a state, is either a bad man or above
humanity; he is like the“Tribeless, lawless, hearthless one,”
whom Homer denounces- the natural outcast is forthwith a lover of
war; he may be compared to an isolated piece at draughts.

















